Chapter 9: Aggregating Preferences: Social Choice

• Page number: 254
  • Section number:9.1.1
  • Date: 2009/02/06
  • Name: SteveWolfman
  • Email:
  • Content: Typo: "..that if there exists a candidate x such that if for all other candidates y at.." should be "..that if there exists a candidate x such that for all other candidates y at..". (It also seems strange that the rest of the paragraph talks about Condorcet "ruling out" candidates rather than establishing b as the only viable candidate, since Condorcet may "rule out" all candidates in this sense but will only ever select one candidate.)
• Page number: 256
  • Section number: 9.2
  • Date: 2009/02/06
  • Name: SteveWolfman
  • Email:
  • Content: Definition 9.2.4, o is unbound, should be \forall o \in S,
• Page number: 265
  • Section number: 9.4
  • Date: 2009/02/06
  • Name: SteveWolfman
  • Email:
  • Content: Typo, in the proof of Step 1, o \in \overbar{O} should be o \in \overbar{O'}.
• Page number:
  • Section number:
  • Date:
  • Name:
  • Email:
  • Content:

-- KevinLeytonBrown - 13 Nov 2008