---++ Chapter 9: Aggregating Preferences: Social Choice * *Page number:267* * Section number:9.5 * Date:2013/05/22 * Name: [[HReijuMihara][HReijuMihara ]] * Email: * Content:The paragraph preceding Proposition 9.5.1. "Arrow's impossibility system" should read "Arrow's impossibility theorem". * *Page number:268* * Section number:9.5 * Date:2013/05/22 * Name: HReijuMihara * Email: * Content:Definition 9.5.2. (i) Should be "to pair up all the voters for o1 with voters for o2". %RED%%BLACK%(ii)%ENDCOLOR%%ENDCOLOR% Need a rewrite because the following conclusion is <span style="color: #dc143c;" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">missing</span> before "Further": "Then the rule weakly prefers o_2 to o_1." * *Page number:269* * Section number:9.5 * Date:2013/05/22 * Name: HReijuMihara * Email: * Content:Just before Definition 9.5.3. Maybe "voters vote for". * *Page number:269* * Section number:9.5 * Date:2013/05/22 * Name: HReijuMihara * Email: * Content:Definition 9.5.3. Need a rewrite because the following conclusion is <span style="color: #dc143c;" class="WYSIWYG_COLOR">missing</span> before "Further": "Then the rule weakly prefers o_2 to o_1." * *Page number:270* * Section number:9.5 * Date:2013/05/22 * Name: HReijuMihara * Email: * Content:Definition 9.5.7. Should be "to pair up all the voters for o1 with voters for o2". ---+++ The following errors are fixed in the second printing of the book and online PDF v1.1 * *Page number: 256* * Section number: 9.2 * Date: 2009/02/06 * Name: SteveWolfman * Email: * Content: Definition 9.2.4, o is unbound, should be \forall o \in S, * *Page number: 265* * Section number: 9.4 * Date: 2009/02/06 * Name: SteveWolfman * Email: * Content: Typo, in the proof of Step 1, o \in \overbar{O} should be o \in \overbar{O'}. * *Page number: 254* * Section number:9.1.1 * Date: 2009/02/06 * Name: SteveWolfman * Email: * Content: Typo: "..that if there exists a candidate x such that if for all other candidates y at.." should be "..that if there exists a candidate x such that for all other candidates y at..". (It also seems strange that the rest of the paragraph talks about Condorcet "ruling out" candidates rather than establishing b as the only viable candidate, since Condorcet may "rule out" all candidates in this sense but will only ever select one candidate.) -- Main.KevinLeytonBrown - 13 Nov 2008
This topic: Main
>
WebHome
>
Errata
>
SocialChoiceErrata
Topic revision: r5 - 2013-05-22 - HReijuMihara
Copyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback