Difference: SocialChoiceErrata (1 vs. 2)

Revision 22009-02-06 - SteveWolfman

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="Errata"

Chapter 9: Aggregating Preferences: Social Choice

Changed:
<
<
  • Page number:
    • Section number:
    • Date:
    • Name:
>
>
  • Page number: 254
 
    • Email:
Changed:
<
<
    • Content:
>
>
    • Content: Typo: "..that if there exists a candidate x such that if for all other candidates y at.." should be "..that if there exists a candidate x such that for all other candidates y at..". (It also seems strange that the rest of the paragraph talks about Condorcet "ruling out" candidates rather than establishing b as the only viable candidate, since Condorcet may "rule out" all candidates in this sense but will only ever select one candidate.)
  • Page number: 256
    • Section number: 9.2
    • Date: 2009/02/06
    • Name: SteveWolfman
    • Email:
    • Content: Definition 9.2.4, o is unbound, should be \forall o \in S,
  • Page number: 265
    • Section number: 9.4
    • Date: 2009/02/06
    • Name: SteveWolfman
    • Email:
    • Content: Typo, in the proof of Step 1, o \in \overbar{O} should be o \in \overbar{O'}.
 
  • Page number:
    • Section number:
    • Date:

Revision 12008-11-13 - KevinLeytonBrown

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="Errata"

Chapter 9: Aggregating Preferences: Social Choice

  • Page number:
    • Section number:
    • Date:
    • Name:
    • Email:
    • Content:
  • Page number:
    • Section number:
    • Date:
    • Name:
    • Email:
    • Content:

-- KevinLeytonBrown - 13 Nov 2008

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2021 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback