Difference: ExtensiveFormErrata (8 vs. 9)

Revision 92010-02-28 - KevinLeytonBrown

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="Errata"

Chapter 5: Games with Sequential Actions: Reasoning and Computing with the Extensive Form

  • Page number:
Line: 14 to 14
 
    • Email:
    • Content:
Deleted:
<
<
  • Page number: 126
    • Section number: 5.1.4
    • Date: 11th Oct 2008
    • Name: Stefan K
    • Email: stefank at cs (dot) stanford (dot) edu
    • Content: Missing fullstop at the end of the page.
  • Page number: 130
    • Section number:5.2.1
    • Date:Feb 18, 2010
    • Name: B.J.Buter
    • Email: bjbuter [at] science [dot] uva [dot] nl
    • Content: Definition 5.2.1 "I=..., equivalence relation" is not an equivalence relation. An equivalence relation is a collection of ordered pairs, thus if I_{i,j} were a relation, then where h \in I_{i,j} is written, h should be an ordered pair, this is not meant. I would rewrite as:"I=(I_1,...,I_n), where I_i={I_{i,1},...,I_{i,k_i}} is a partition of \{h\in H : \rho(h) = i\}, with I_{i,j} equivalence classes."
  • Page number: 133
    • Section number:5.2.3
    • Date:Feb19, 2010
    • Name B.J.Buter
    • Email: bjbuter [at] science [dot] uva [dot] nl
    • Content: Definition 5.2.3, item 2 equivalence classes are only defined for nodes where a player acts, according to definition 5.2.1. The restriction if \rho(h_j)=i should be added.
 

The following errors are fixed in the second printing of the book and online PDF v1.1

  • Page number: 144
    • Section number: 5.2.4
Line: 58 to 39
 
    • Name B.J.Buter
    • Email: bjbuter [at] science [dot] uva [dot] nl
    • Content: Definition 5.2.3, using n as a counter is confusing since in other definitions n indicates the number of players.
Added:
>
>
  • Page number: 130
    • Section number:5.2.1
    • Date:Feb 18, 2010
    • Name: B.J.Buter
    • Email: bjbuter [at] science [dot] uva [dot] nl
    • Content: Definition 5.2.1 "I=..., equivalence relation" is not an equivalence relation. An equivalence relation is a collection of ordered pairs, thus if I_{i,j} were a relation, then where h \in I_{i,j} is written, h should be an ordered pair, this is not meant. I would rewrite as:"I=(I_1,...,I_n), where I_i={I_{i,1},...,I_{i,k_i}} is a partition of \{h\in H : \rho(h) = i\}, with I_{i,j} equivalence classes."
  • Page number: 133
    • Section number:5.2.3
    • Date:Feb19, 2010
    • Name B.J.Buter
    • Email: bjbuter [at] science [dot] uva [dot] nl
    • Content: Definition 5.2.3, item 2 equivalence classes are only defined for nodes where a player acts, according to definition 5.2.1. The restriction if \rho(h_j)=i should be added.
  • Page number: 137-138
    • Section number:5.2.4
    • Date:Feb 27, 2010
    • Name:Nicolas Lambert
    • Content:All instances of S should be replaced by s for consistency with the rest of the book.
  -- KevinLeytonBrown - 13 Nov 2008 \ No newline at end of file
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback